Features
Part of Credit bureaus compared: Dun & Bradstreet, Experian, Equifax
Credit bureaus review claims: how to vet them
Credit bureaus review claims come in the bureaus' own vocabulary. Learn how to test each claim, who to ask, and what a fair offer actually states.
Most of what is sold as a credit bureaus review comes from companies that are not bureaus. The pitches are made in the bureaus' vocabulary, which is what makes them hard to assess: the words are real, the relationship being implied usually is not.
This is a method for reading those claims, and for deciding which ones are worth a phone call before you spend anything.
Who the bureaus are
Consumer files in the United States are held by three nationwide agencies: Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion, with Innovis a smaller fourth. Business credit files are held by Dun & Bradstreet, Experian Business, and Equifax Commercial. Each keeps its own record, so a claim about the bureaus in general is usually a claim about one of them, or about none.
What to take away
- Separate what a claim asserts from what it implies. Most of the value in these pitches lives in the implication, which is also the part nobody has to stand behind.
- Verification runs in one directionask the party who would have to be true for the claim to be true, not the party making it.
- Some claims cannot be true no matter who makes them, because they promise a decision the speaker does not make.
Five claims and what they can honestly mean
What it could legitimately mean
- "Bureau-approved partner"
- The firm resells a bureau product, or has completed some commercial arrangement
- "We will get your business listed with all the bureaus"
- They will make sure your entity details are consistent and complete, and register where registration is open
- "We have a direct data feed"
- They receive data under an agreement
- "We can remove negative items"
- They will raise corrections where an entry is wrong
- "Our clients get better terms"
- Some clients later received terms
What it cannot mean
- "Bureau-approved partner"
- That the bureau vouches for its advice, its results, or its other services
- "We will get your business listed with all the bureaus"
- That your file will contain accounts, since accounts arrive from creditors who choose to report
- "We have a direct data feed"
- That they can insert entries about you at will, or that their copy is more accurate than the source
- "We can remove negative items"
- That accurate entries can be made to disappear
- "Our clients get better terms"
- That the service caused it, or that a lender's policy is known to them
The pattern is the same across all five. A defensible core, wrapped in an
Five claims vs what they mean
The claim
- Bureau-approved partner
- Resells a bureau product
- Listed with all bureaus
- Details consistent and complete
- Direct data feed
- Data under an agreement
- Remove negative items
- Raises corrections where wrong
- Clients get better terms
- Some clients later received terms
Could mean
- Bureau-approved partner
- Bureau vouches for advice
- Listed with all bureaus
- File will contain accounts
- Direct data feed
- Can insert entries at will
- Remove negative items
- Accurate entries disappear
- Clients get better terms
- Service caused the terms
Cannot mean
- Bureau-approved partner
- Listed with all bureaus
- Direct data feed
- Remove negative items
- Clients get better terms
Verification, in order
- Ask the party named. If a firm claims a relationship with a bureau, ask the bureau what that relationship is, using the bureau's own contact route
Verification, in order
- Ask the party named, via bureau's own contact
- Ask the counterparty who will actually decide
- Ask for it in writing, scope and deliverable
- Read the regulator's current material
rather than a link the firm gave you. 2. Ask the counterparty who will actually decide. Your lender or supplier can tell you which bureau they pull and what else they look at. That single answer invalidates most of the pitches you will hear. 3. Ask for it in writing. Not the marketing page: an email that states the scope and the deliverable in the firm's own words. Claims tend to shrink when they have to be typed by a named person. 4. Read the law and the regulator's current material. What bureaus and furnishers must do with a dispute is set out in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and firms that sell credit-repair services are covered by the Credit Repair Organizations Act. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission both publish on credit reporting and on credit-repair claims. Read what they say now, rather than a vendor's account of what they say.
Claims that cannot be true by construction
Three categories fail before you check anything.
A promise about somebody else's decision. Approval, terms, a limit. The firm is not in the room and the policy is not published.
A promise about a number produced by a model the firm does not run. Bureaus build their own indicators. Nobody outside can commit to an output.
A promise to give you history you do not have. This is where the tradeline market sits: paying to appear on an account belonging to somebody else so a lender reads a record that is not yours. It is misrepresentation to the lender however it is packaged, and the application carries your signature, not the vendor's.
A firm making any of the three is telling you how it treats the boundary between selling and lying. That is useful information about everything else it says.
What a fair offer reads like
It describes work, not results. It names what will be done, to which records, and how you will know it happened. It states the term and how to end it. It leaves your logins and your documents with you. It does not require you to route communications from bureaus or creditors through the firm.
And it says out loud which parts you could do yourself. That sentence appears in honest offers surprisingly often, and almost never in the other kind. Compare what is on offer against the bureau products you can buy directly before deciding what the firm is adding.
Two neutral references make most of these claims easier to test. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's explanation of what a credit report is describes who supplies the entries and who displays them, which is the distinction most sales pitches blur. The Federal Trade Commission's credit and finance guidance covers what is expected of firms selling into this market.
Common questions
A firm showed me a screenshot of a corrected file. Is that evidence?
Of something happening to somebody, at some point. It is not evidence about your file, and it does not distinguish a correction from an entry that would have aged off anyway. Ask what specifically was disputed and on what grounds.
Should I ever hand over authority to act on my behalf?
Only after reading what the authority covers and how it ends. Broad authority to correspond with bureaus and creditors in your name is not a formality, and narrowing it is a reasonable thing to ask for.
If a claim survives all of this, is the service worth buying?
Then you are back to an ordinary purchase: does the work save you more than it costs, given what you would otherwise do yourself?
Read what the bureaus each hold first. Avoid the dealing mistakes that make people buy help for a problem they have not identified. A wrong entry is fixed through the bureau's own process, with or without a firm involved.
